Davis’ placement would know about that, or at least take the slightest trouble to find studies prior to going on CNN to proclaim that no such studies exist. The study’s primary interest was to find increased incidences of brain or nervous system cancers, salivary gland tumor, and leukaemia. Further it might curiosity you that the study on cell phone and radiation exposure concluded saying: Risk for these cancers did not vary by period of cellular telephone make use of, time since first subscription, age at first subscription, or type of cellular phone . Evaluation of brain and anxious system tumours demonstrated no statistically significant [standardized incidence ratios] for just about any subtype or anatomic location.Rate of consuming among those who owned a branded item was 25.5 percent, compared to 13.1 percent of those who didn’t own a branded item. The study concluded that after controlling for other risk elements for drinking even, students who owned alcohol-branded products were 1.5 times more likely to initiate consuming than students who didn’t. Related StoriesAlternative tobacco items pose a fresh challenge in the war against tobaccoTobacco use continues to be a high threat to health insurance and economic well-being of people in ChinaTobacco cessation system must be more widely used for teens with substance abuse issues: Research’This study raises concern about the relationship between the products that promote alcoholic beverages brands and early-onset teen drinking,’ stated McClure, a practicing pediatrician at Dartmouth-Hitchcock INFIRMARY.